Wardforce, EPMC US patent 7531930 energy-ingenuity.com Video

In this video I will demonstrate that Wardforce exists, can be manipulated to generate torque and prove control over this force. By definition, wardforce is the push-pull part of a magnetic field. This device demonstrating torque can be generated, is only one use of this force.
I am using 3 different voltage inputs to the DC drive motor, 25v, 35v and 45v.
I have a:
1.DC power supply for input observations.
2.Hose used for coupling DC motor shaft to the shaft on an Energy Producing Magnetic Converter, US patent 7531930.
3.Digital tachometer for shaft speed observations.
I have a layered steel (laminate) core with copper wire coil taken from an AC motor. The core has been modified.
At 25v (showing more input is required) demonstrating the pulling part of the field.
At 35v with no change in needed input, this demonstrates more control of the wardforce.
At 45v (showing less input is required) demonstrating the push part of the field.

Save & Share:

Energyingenuitycom: Your commet shows you don't understand what I am showing on the videos. I can tell you use what you have been taught when comming to your conclusions. I offer physical proof of my claims. What do you offer, what you have BEEN TAUGHT? All the groups and businesses I have demonstrated to are not as smart as you are, RIGHT.

DreamAquaMarine: You found a way of making your small electric motor 1% more effiient...good job but it won't change anything on this planet.

Energyingenuitycom: The point you are not seeing is "control of wardforce" (push-pull part of a magnetic field).

Energyingenuitycom: This device is demonstrating control over wardforce (push-pull part of a magnetic field).

DreamAquaMarine: What I see is the only thing that matters.... one percent reduction in power to run a motor is insignificant.... show me a 50% reduction and then I'll say you have something to talk about.

AdminOnDuty: Hi Steven, Interesting video, can you tell us more regarding the generator section;i.e. the magnet you are using etc? It appears on the surface that the inductive reactance of your coil is changing (increasing) with the higher RPM's. You need to monitor the amperage in the generator - easy to do with a standard ammeter, simply use the ammeter as the shorting jumper (mind your current limits). If the generator amperage increases with RPM then I will have a closer look at your work. Cheers =)

Energyingenuitycom: You are looking at the wrong thing. The force used to control the controller assimbly is not amperage. When current is used output increases and input is reduced from idle. Pulling the drive motor faster, showing torque is generated. Look at video #2, you will see what happens when the use of wardforce is multiplied.

AdminOnDuty: Hi Steven, Have I missed the purpose of your test? My understanding is that you have shorted out the windings of your generator to effect a maximum load, is that correct? If so, then the maximum load should show a maximum current through the generator windings, therefore effecting the maximum counter torque against the supply motor by what you term the 'wardforce'. But you infer on your websiite that ["Video #3 demonstrates wardforce being contorled."], which I thought may be a misprint? ...

AdminOnDuty: ... perhaps it was to say 'controlled' ? Or is a 'Contorl' a new term associated with how the 'wardforce' is structured? At any rate, I took it to mean that you were controlling the 'wardforce' by increasing the supply voltage thereby changing the RPM of the motor. Since you personally did not change anything with the load configuration, we must conclude that the change was proportionate to the RPM change. This is in line with conventional inductive reactance. The amperage through your ...

AdminOnDuty: ... shorted coil would tell us volumes more about what is going on here and frankly is a very necessary missing step in your demonstrations. Without it, we have no means of placing a value on the the load, without which the demonstration fails to make your desired point. I see you have put many, many man hours and other resources into your concept here and I am trying to help you present it in a way that will convince the masses of its validity. Best Wishes, Harvey

Energyingenuitycom: I am showing 3 different reactions on the same shaft changing speed only. How do you explain different reactions with 3 speeds? When a load is applied, forward motion increase, that is not a brake. I offer video and physical proof, yet your comment shows you do not understand what you have seen in this video. 3 different reactions, changing speed only, demonstrating control of wardforce (push-pull part of magnetic field).

Energyingenuitycom: I see, you do not understand HOW I am causing these reactions. I have posted video of 6 different devices, explained in my words how the reactions are caused and have an US patent posted on my website. A demonstration is also possible thru my website. What else can I do with the lack of resources? I have demonstrated to many "highly educated" groups and NO ONE, who has attended my demonstration, has said my claims are not true. Maybe you should read my site. SteveW

Author: Energyingenuitycom; Uploaded: Nov 5, 2009; Duration: 2:41; Views: 491

Tags: new  brandnew  clean  renewable  green  energy  greenenergy  energyingenuity  verifiable  free  cleanenergy  freeenergy  eco  news  breaking  breakingnews  energyfrommagnets  magneticenergy  magnets  patent office patents patent boots patent foramen ovale patent search patents online patent office uk patent attorney patent leather patent ductus arteriosus