Detroit Elections Meeting Part 4 -- Detroit Elections Fair or Fraud? Video

After November 3rd 2009 elections in Detroit Michigan, some were left in a state of disbelief. At the center of the controversy are the M-100 automated ballot counting voting machines. Are they defective? Some would like to know. Statistical anomalies are now surfacing related to the M-100s that some believe are not possible, as other evidence supporting these anomalies has started to disappear. One example is the mayor's race 1989 and 2009 percentages for winner and loser are identical. Another example is the percentage for mayor's race and city clerk's race are identical in the 2005 General Detroit Election. Another example is that all proposals past for the 2009 elections passed in the 70th percentile for the last 2 elections. Proposal 0 73% to 26% win ,Proposal D 72% to 27% win, Proposal C 77% to 22% win, with exception of proposal S 60% to 39% win. Are these real results, or is there something behind these numbers?