General of US Intelligence says No airplane Hit The Pentagon!!! Video

If you haven't yet watched this revealing video, then please take 5 minutes to hear retired Army Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III, Head of US Intelligence on 9/11, explain how:

A) The Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane
B) WTC-7 was brought down by explosives
C) The media in America is controlled.
D) The 9/11 Commission Report is false.

The video is attached. Please also rate, favorite, and share.

Tell your friends:

Th2EyA0rEa1MoN2gUs: yup

mckockiner: The truth will eventually reveal itself. Thank you General Stubblebine!

Nyhee7: wow, do all of these people have to be near death to tell us the truth? Oh well, at least he can die with a clearer conscience.

Hubbleknarf: He has been proven wrong anyway... Something without wings can't knock down lamp poles. Dumbass

thevoiceofalexjones: there were no wings, engine or anything that resembles a plane found in the rubble. If wings would have hit the poles, you would have had wings found laying around. None!

911insidejob81: great video

Hubbleknarf: The wings were in the ruins of the pentagon, they smashed in there at a really hard speed, you cant see a clear mark on the Penrtagon wall because the wings aren't strong enough to smash trough it. Instead they were crushed real hard so pictures cant show anything that clearly resembles A wing. And besides, no truther ever came with a theory about the Lamp poles and the generator that were hit. Can you come up with an explanation for that?

Hubbleknarf: I'm still waiting for the answer to my question...

mcap52: I am assuming that you consider yourself more of an expert on the Pentagon attack than a former intelligence employee?

Hubbleknarf: It amazes me that a man who 'has a lot of experience looking at photographs' didn't notice the lamp poles or the moved and burning generator, even though he 'analysed and looked at the fotos very closely' And then comes with the conclusion, i cant see wings, so there is no airplane. So yeah i do consider myself more of an expert.

rkaztaw: Hubbleknarf : you cant see a clear mark on the Penrtagon wall because the wings aren't strong enough to smash trough it. _____________________________ Is that a fact ha ? But the wings can penetrate twins iron outside walls very easily. You are an idiot

Hubbleknarf: Iron and reinforced concrete are two tottaly different things.

rkaztaw: Ok, you want to get answer on what hit the poles..Here you have..Go to penta..and ask for other (at least 50)cameras material. Then check what hit the poles. By the way, you can even check what hit the pentagon, Dumbass

Hubbleknarf: How about eye wittnesses who saw the plane? Doesn't make much sence that nobody saw a missile, and all the wittnesses saw an airplane. and the fact that there was a lot of debris from a plane scattered across the lawn.

rkaztaw: Well, you want to run away from my suggestion to you.Good..But you know what, cameras are better witnesses and free of 'charges' as well.

Hubbleknarf: There actually is a camera showing the plane, but its a low resolution. But you just ignore all the eye wittnesses? they are all lying? 200 eye witnesses saw an airplane and they are all lying? And the debris came out of nowhere? and the lamp poles got knocked down by a missile. Go fuck yourself.

Hubbleknarf: I meant go kill yourself.

rkaztaw: Indeed..Like aluminium and iron :)

Hubbleknarf: ಠ_ಠ

squirrelwalk74: there is more than 50 cameras around Pentagon and no plain was detected?! human can be scared of someone or forced to say something under pressure or money but cameras dont lie

squirrelwalk74: edit>airplaines

wingnut4427: No need arguing with these idiots. Never mind the fact that the melting point of steel was about 1800 degrees from the melting point. I guess the fires from the pentagon explosion melted the Steel & titanium engines on the plane. These fools will believe anything just so long as they don't have to think & study the facts for themselves.

Mojo1982: Thank God there people in the US military that have integrity and decency. The lies of the 9/11 are so obvious, the official Gov version of events are so implausible.

pspboy7: If a plane hit the Pentagon, the side of it should of looked like the WTC buildings, but it obviously doesn't, plus the fact that so little debris was in the area. The Pentagon crash was definitely a hoax. It was more than likely, an inside job. If you look carefully at the physical evidence, it is similar to the demolition pattern of buildings.

Author: thevoiceofalexjones; Uploaded: Jul 5, 2009; Duration: 5:16; Views: 1698

Tags: new  world  order  alex  jones  infowars  prisonplanet  ron  paul  revolution  2009  audit  fed  hr  1207  federal  reserve  economy  recession  elite  bankers  ventura  kucinich  schiff  gerald  celente  depression  barack  obama  truth  news  politics  government  911  intelligence  lies  zionist  cover  up  masonic  society  secrets  bush  masons  biden  depopulation  global  control  fema  camps  trains  love  freedom  music  future  2012  begins  pentagon direct pentagon mercedes pentagon tiles pentagongps pentagon 9 11 pentagon oldham pentagon toyota pentagon cars pentagon vauxhall pentagon barnsley