Y-Origins Debunked (Part 2b) - Accident or Intellegent Design? Video

Part A: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6npqENB7TA
Part C: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Pzd7Bu9apY

My narrator, stefzula: http://www.youtube.com/user/stefzula
Subscribe!

Accident or Intellegent Design? Here we go; they start out with the classic Creationist false dichotomy. Marc Surtees would be proud.

"Oh noes!! The evil materialistic scientists are so arrogantly assuming that the Universe is limited to simplistic non-fantasies!"

The authors of Y-Origins seems to live in a world in which science has historically required Christianity to function.

This is one of the saddest arguments presented by Creationists because they are missing the magnificence that exists all around them. They believe that by looking at the their surroundings, imposing a supernatural origin (God, magic fairies, what have you,) and then being impressed by the imagined things supposed ability to create our existence makes their view somehow more enlightened then any non-biased investigation. The opposite is in fact true. Everything I have ever learned about science has been more exciting and more inviting than any story has ever been, whether it be from the pages of a religious text or an episode of "Star Trek". Even something as seemingly sterile as Calculus has provided me glimpses into a universe far more incredible than I could ever imagine.

Creationists wave their hands at all of that and instead pretend that the collimated efforts of millions of people over thousands of years is itself, a vague and unsubstantiated fable they call, Evolutionism, or in the case of Y-Origins, Materialism.

This argument is what began the downfall of VenomFangX. His arrogant assumptions that the existing scientific theories were so simple that an uneducated prick like him could challenge their validitys is part of what motivated him to invite Thunderf00t to a debate.

*Note: I know that I generalized the wide verity of religious beliefs, I needed to do that for brevity.

Video on string theory: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLZKqGbNfck

C0nc0rdances video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60uJ7sOx_1A&feature=player_profilepage

Check these guys out!! http://5secondfilms.com

Save & Share:

NeedsEvidence: Note that string theory does NOT make testable predictions - as yet. It is still under construction.

longstrider9999: Great video...and the nephillimfree "I swallow" its really funny, people in the faith or the extremists on the faith will never see beyond their conceptions because it saceres them shitless, and they want to keep all that shit within them it makes them feel secure and accepted and part of something, without realising that there is actually no need for relligion in any way, and that is sad.

pilgrimpater: Neph is one of those YT posters where it is nigh on impossible to determine if he is a spoof or not (some Fundies have such a problem with EdwardCurrent). Not only is he under the illusion about Creation but he seriously thinks of himself as a genuine scientist ............ all through spending 2 years surfing the net .... as opposed to carrying out testable, predictable experiments.

celestialsalamander: is that stefzular reading that?

ILYIAB: Great vid! Waiting for the next one... Still waiting... ;-)

boonw: Great video, but Mr. Chadwick, you need to stop calling wikipedia "wikalpedia". Other than that I give you five stars and look forward to your next video

freedom0f5peech: Best Yet! Bravo!

stefzula: did you read the description? :-)

celestialsalamander: urr... no

nebulajr: Fucking rock and roll!

IllPropaganda: Very fresh! Excellent production! 5!

charms2: 2:47 - priceless!

gorypleasure: NephilimFree: I swallow = Awesome! Good job.

JRChadwick: It does make testable predictions. The image of the particle accelerator is a loose illustration of what is being done to test it. A large particle gun is being constructed in order to test for the existence of the graviton.

NeedsEvidence: JRChadwick, I am referring to 0:31, "String theory makes testable predictions." - unfortunately, it is not directly testable as yet, but the theory is under development. Large particle guns like LHC and Tevatron can test lots of things - the standard model of particle physics, large extra dimensions, the existence of gravitons, etc - but their energy is by far not large enough to directly probe strings. But, as I said, improvements in theory and experiment are on the way.

TheReasonWhyGuy: Why do you say wiklpedia... wikl? it's wiki like wih kee not wih kle

okristian1: I LOVE how the lady reading the text struggles to get trough it. It tells me so much.

mecher3k: Oh that part was awesome.

JRChadwick: I don't know!!!!!! :P

JRChadwick: It's good to finally get a video out!

JRChadwick: I doubt he is a satirist. He has gone too far and for too long.

JRChadwick: Yes, it is not testable with the usual facilities, but there is a new accelerator being built for this purpose.

TheReasonWhyGuy: wickle XD

NeedsEvidence: Are you sure? The only thing I am aware of is that the new LHC might probe so-called large extra dimensions in which certain Graviton-induced collisions would spill some energy into a different dimension, thus causing some measurable energy imbalance. Unfortunately this is not an unambiguous experimental signature for strings. But, as I said, both theory and experiment are under development, and the theory has even not yet reach its final formulation due to mathematical difficulties.

GlorifiedTruth: I was under the same impression. I hadn't heard that newer facilities were going to surmount this obstacle.

Author: JRChadwick; Uploaded: Oct 28, 2009; Duration: 4:52; Views: 1195

Tags: y-origns  creationism  dawkins  einstein  halkings  idiots  conspiracy  doctor  answers  theanswersofnwo3  jrchadwick  stefzula  religion  god  bible  nephilimfree  venomfangx  origins of surnames origins of nursery rhymes origins skin care origins of names origins of halloween origins of sayings origins somerset house origins of words origins of phrases origins of football