Do you think Debbie Rowe should get the Jackson children?

I understand that she is their biological mother but she's never taken an interest in them before Jackson's death. I feel she's just after the money. I hope she does not get custody.

Gasbag:
No.

Jessica:
Maybe.

moo cow:
no

dancergirl08:
Hell no!!!!! She got her check already, she need to crawl back in the hole she came out of!!!!

Tom J:
She sold them to him. That wasn't rent he paid to her.

daljack -a girl:
I think she should have liberal visitation rights.

They deserve to know their mother.

Abby:
No because she told Michael that he needed kids and they after they finished their business and they were born she told Michael that those kids are his. She never came to visit them and the children don't claim her as their mother. She already has money that Jackson has given her and she should already know that she isn't gonna get those children so it is a waste of a fight.

Christopher:
Absolutely not, she didn't want them and she gave up her rights as a mother. So no not at all!

Lena:
No, because she was never interested in raising them before and gave up her parental rights. I think that if she got those kids now, she wouldn't be a good mother to them and wouldn't raise them very well. I really hope they stay with Michael's mother.

George Washington:
If she didn't have an interest to this point in there life then she doesn't deserve the children.

justlookin4friendsonly:
She's ONLY the Mother of the 2 youngest kids. She signed away her parental rights, then went to court & asked for her paternal rights back again. Then she asked Michael Jackson for more money & she signed her parental rights away again. They will NOT let her get her parental rights back again after she signed them away TWICE! Michael wanted his Mother or if she could not handle them for whatever reason, Liz Taylor to have custody, according to his Will.

Pascha:
We don't really know the circumstances here. We don't know that she hasn't taken an interest in them.

Some people have criticized her for not seeing her children. But they were living in Bahrain, Ireland, etc. Even if she had gone there, i wonder if she would have been let in.

I don't like it when someone in a family is frozen out. If the kids haven't had contact with her, the only thing they know about her is what they have been told. If they have heard only bad things, then that in itself presents a barrier to a normal mother-child relationship.

Whoever gets custody, I think those kids face a tough adjustment in their lives.

Stardust:
I think that Debbie Rowe should not get the children. With recent developments of her losing her temper and swearing at paparazzi, it makes me wonder if she is capable of dealing with a child. Debbie should not get the children. They would be much safer and happier with Katherine or Diana Ross, who has been praised as a wonderful mother. If neither of them, I think Janet should get the kids.

Nathalie:
No she shouldn't

hannahmommy:
She was a surrogate and only his wife for the purposes of bearing his children. This does not mean that she can't feel for children who she shares biology with. She showed an interest when it was necessary and there was a possibility of him going to jail. I would be p***ed to if somebody touched me too. It sounds like she wants to make a decision that will be best for the children whether it is with her or not and is not going to force herself on the children.

Mantaj:
Debbie needs to be a complete idiot to think she can get them. I saw how michael's family hugged michael's daughter when she began crying on stage at the memorial. Where was debbie?, and she swore at the reporter as if she has no care for anybody. She just wants the money even though she said their"Michael's kids" and not hers. But why does she want them now?, exactly.