Isit me or does no one want Michael Jackson's children to go to Debbie Rowe?

Before any mean answers, just dont answer the question. anyways

i want them to stay with Jacko's mother. And not Debbie Rowe, Jacko never loved her. lol but i seriously dont want them to go to her, even in Michael's will it says they should go to his mother.

Daniel C:
She does not want them anyway, so there is no need to worry about it, they are not going anywhere

Ann R:
Yes. i Agree with you

Emmy:
michael jackson is soooo awsome y would u say that >:(

R.I.P. King of POP!:
No, it's not just you. I don't really want the kids to go Debbie either.
They don't have much of a relationship anyways. It'd feel weird and uncomfortable for me to live with someone I never really knew that well.

Nick - 4:
How the fuck would you know if Jacko ever loved her or not? I don't care about this particular issue, I'm just asking, HOW could you POSSIBLY know what went on in Michael Jackson's head?

raina_vissora:
To be perfectly honest, it's no one's business but the family's. In the end, the children should be with the people they want to be with... not the ones who have the most "claim" on them or the ones MJ's fans "want" them to go to.

And I think it's rather cruel to say he never loved her. He did, as much as he could, I think. But the man really was a child at heart.

R.I.P MJ.<3:
They aren't going to Debbie. His mother is legally looking after them now.

And why do you find it so hard to refer to him by his real name? Its MICHAEL not Jacko.

RIP Michael<33
King of Pop

Gemma:
I agree with you i dont think they should go to her. Michael didnt want that. Ive got the feeling that she has hardly seen her children anyway? So why should she have them now. I dont know about if he loved her but they did marry so there must have been something for each other i dont know. I just hope her kids dont get too messed around with the custody decisions etc. R.I.P MJ xxx

ramjey:
why do we worry about rich people,

Not up to use where the kids live, but if Debbie Rowe want the kids because she is not in the Will, then she must stand up and admit she sold her kids to micheal jackson, think that is a crime and she must pay the price have the money paid for them taken off her & do some jail time let her have the kids if they are hers, but she said the kids not jacksons so no child sapport 0ff jacksons estate,

❤PomMom❤ Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Spay & Neuter:
It' isn't just you. Those kids should be with the Jackson's. They don't even know who Debbie Rowe is! She hasn't been in their lives. It's traumatic enough that their dad died. Then if they are forced to go live with a stranger (Rowe) it will devastate them!

misslala0510:
Heck no she shouldn't get those kids!! Does she think everyone forgot that she SOLD her parental rights away. She's looking for a payoff from the family, what a golddigger! Those kids loved their dad, you could tell that from the interviews they did with him. And let's not forget they are Michael Jackson's children. His mother knows how to care for famous kids. Who knows what Debbie Rowe would let happen to them.

Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄ƷPetoonia:
This is going to be an all out battle on Debbie Rowe's part.
She doesn't care about those kids. She only wants the 40% MJ left them in their will.That is what she wants control over.
When those children were born, MJ should have adopted them. This sounds dumb but it would have dissolved any hold Debbie Rowe could have claimed, A biological mother can't come back and seek custody of children she put up for adoption.
Unfortunately, the courts reinstated her parental rights which is going to give her an excellent chance in getting custody.

RedSnook:
I think its a bit rich to be putting herself forward for parental responsibility when she absolved herself of any it with a nice fat cheque from Mr Jackson.
If it is in the best interest of the CHILDREN to stay with their grandmother then so be it. Jacko was a lot of things but stupid was not one of them, he knew what he was doing with his kids.
Good luck to them all.

cutiepatooty:
I think the children should remain with the Jackson family allowing Katherine Jackson continued custody over the kids. It was in Michael Jackson's will, he was raising the kids, and I strongly believe that the judicial system should respect Michael's decision. If the judge looks at the facts: Debbie sold her parental rights, was not active in their lives, and is not mentioned the least bit in Michael's will should be more than enough indication that somethings not right with this Debbie chic. Now they're trying to say that because of Katherine's age, she may not be in shape to raise small children. Okay, granted that may be true, but there's a whole bunch of aunts and uncles (MJ's brother's and sisters) in that family that will HELP her and be more than happy to intervene. Besides, there's money in that family and a strong sense of closeness and support. The kids will always be more than well fed, clothed, sheltered and educated more than the average kid. C'MON, WHAT IS THERE TO DEBATE ABOUT!!! That Debbie girl is a no..no...and I rest my case!

I MISS YOU MJ - The last legend:
debbie deliberately gave her children up to michael in exchange of money. No LOVING parent would do that. The only reason why she's got this sudden interest in her children again is because she wants to get her hands on that inheritance that he left behind for the kids. Michael wanted to make sure that when he died, his children would be guaranteed a good living, and i personally think she would use the children....They'd be better off with Katherine